<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Not the straight story</title>
	<atom:link href="http://journalism.indiana.edu/resources/ethics/sensitive-news-topics/not-the-straight-story/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://journalism.indiana.edu/resources/ethics/sensitive-news-topics/not-the-straight-story/</link>
	<description>Journalism ethics cases online</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 13:35:18 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Haley Waldkoetter</title>
		<link>http://journalism.indiana.edu/resources/ethics/sensitive-news-topics/not-the-straight-story/comment-page-1/#comment-30346</link>
		<dc:creator>Haley Waldkoetter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 16:26:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://journalism.indiana.edu/resources/ethics/sensitive-news-topics/not-the-straight-story/#comment-30346</guid>
		<description>I think what David Gross did is justifiable. I think that trying to shield the WM&#039;s family does make it some what justifiable because the family probably didn&#039;t know where all of his ads were published if WM did publish ads as he claimed in &quot;hundreds of papers&quot;.  I don&#039;t think that misleading the readers would be justifiable if it was just to make the news more positive though. The ads did cease, which is the important thing, the community didn&#039;t need to know how he reacted because of the judgements the would make on him and his family.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think what David Gross did is justifiable. I think that trying to shield the WM&#8217;s family does make it some what justifiable because the family probably didn&#8217;t know where all of his ads were published if WM did publish ads as he claimed in &#8220;hundreds of papers&#8221;.  I don&#8217;t think that misleading the readers would be justifiable if it was just to make the news more positive though. The ads did cease, which is the important thing, the community didn&#8217;t need to know how he reacted because of the judgements the would make on him and his family.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jill Chickedantz</title>
		<link>http://journalism.indiana.edu/resources/ethics/sensitive-news-topics/not-the-straight-story/comment-page-1/#comment-30327</link>
		<dc:creator>Jill Chickedantz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 14:01:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://journalism.indiana.edu/resources/ethics/sensitive-news-topics/not-the-straight-story/#comment-30327</guid>
		<description>I like this article.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like this article.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
